ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Concurrent acute interstitial nephritis with acute pyelonephritis in DRESS syndrome: a rare case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe, life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction characterized by fever, rash, eosinophilia, and multi-organ involvement. Renal manifestations, particularly acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), are common, but the concurrent presentation of acute pyelonephritis (APN) with AIN in DRESS syndrome is rare and not previously documented. Case presentation: A 19-year-old female presented with fever, vomiting, erythematous rash, and facial swelling. She had a history of prolonged use of Sulfasalazine and Cotrimoxazole. Laboratory tests revealed eosinophilia, nephrotic syndrome, and elevated liver enzymes. Renal biopsy showed features of APN, while clinical findings suggested AIN. Based on clinical, histopathological, and serological findings, DRESS syndrome was diagnosed. Discussion: DRESS syndrome, often triggered by medications like Sulfasalazine and Cotrimoxazole, can involve multiple organs, with renal manifestations being common. While AIN is typical, this case highlights the rare occurrence of concurrent APN. The absence of bacteriuria and pyuria suggests a non-bacterial cause for the APN, possibly related to viral reactivation. Conclusion: This case underscores the need for careful diagnosis and management of DRESS syndrome with atypical renal involvement. It highlights the importance of early identification and discontinuation of the offending drugs, as well as the necessity for further research to understand the complex renal manifestations in DRESS syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.