Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40486570›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

Revolutionizing hematological disorder diagnosis: unraveling the role of artificial intelligence.

Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emmanuel Ifeanyi ObeaguDepartment of Biomedical and Laboratory Science, Africa University, Mutare, Zimbabwe.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medical diagnostics is transforming the landscape of healthcare, particularly in hematology. AI technologies, leveraging advanced machine learning algorithms and big data analytics, are revolutionizing the diagnosis of hematological disorders such as anemia, leukemia, and lymphoma. This review explores how AI enhances diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and patient outcomes by processing complex datasets and identifying patterns beyond human capability. AI-driven advancements in hematology include innovations in image analysis, genomic data interpretation, and predictive modeling. Convolutional neural networks analyze blood smear images with high precision, detecting subtle morphological abnormalities and classifying blood cells. Machine learning models interpret genomic data, identifying genetic mutations linked to specific disorders, which is crucial for diagnosing hereditary blood conditions and cancers. Predictive modeling, based on historical patient data, forecasts disease progression and treatment responses, enabling personalized patient management. Despite the promising benefits, the implementation of AI in hematological diagnostics faces challenges such as ensuring data quality and integration, addressing ethical and regulatory concerns, and maintaining transparency and accountability of AI algorithms. Ongoing research and collaboration between clinicians, data scientists, and regulatory bodies are essential to advance AI capabilities and ensure safe and effective solutions. As AI continues to evolve, its integration into hematology holds significant promise for improving diagnostic practices and patient care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebig datadiagnosticshematological disordersmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40486570
PMCPMC12140674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.