Evidence mapPaperPMID 40486646Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

Stress-induced hemostasis: mechanisms and implications for health.

Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Circadian clock regulation of hemostasis: a systematic review of molecular pathways.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emmanuel Ifeanyi ObeaguDepartment of Biomedical and Laboratory Science, Africa University, Mutare, Zimbabwe.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress, encompassing both psychological and physical dimensions, profoundly affects the hemostatic system, which is responsible for maintaining the delicate balance between blood fluidity and clot formation. The interplay between stress and hemostasis involves intricate mechanisms where stress hormones like cortisol, adrenaline, and noradrenaline interact with coagulation factors and platelets, promoting a hypercoagulable state. This review delves into the various pathways through which stress influences hemostasis, highlighting the critical roles of the sympathetic nervous system, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and inflammatory mediators. Psychological stress, arising from anxiety, depression, and acute mental stress, has been shown to elevate levels of coagulation factors such as fibrinogen and D-dimer, increasing the risk of thrombotic events. Similarly, physical stress from intense exercise or trauma enhances platelet reactivity and the expression of procoagulant factors. The body's response to severe physical stress, such as trauma or burns, can overwhelm the hemostatic system, leading to conditions like disseminated intravascular coagulation, characterized by widespread clotting and subsequent bleeding. The health implications of stress-induced hemostatic changes are significant, particularly concerning cardiovascular diseases. Chronic stress contributes to persistent hypercoagulability, elevating the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. Acute stress episodes can precipitate acute coronary syndromes, especially in individuals with preexisting conditions like hypertension or diabetes.

Indexed as

coagulationhealth implicationshemostasisinflammatory pathwaysstress

Identifiers

PMID40486646
PMCPMC12140743

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.