ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025
US food allergy patients' experiences, priorities, and needs: A qualitative study.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Understanding patient experiences with food allergies (FAs) is essential for developing treatments that meet patients' needs and aiding clinicians in optimizing care. Objective: We sought to provide clinicians and researchers with an inclusive view of IgE-mediated FA patients' experiences, including (1) FA's natural history, including signs, symptoms, health system experiences, and diagnosis pathways; (2) the disease's burden and psychosocial impacts on individuals and families; (3) perspectives on treatment attributes, benefits, and clinical trial participation; and (4) topics and resources patients and caregivers seek regarding FAs. Enhanced understanding of these challenges and opportunities can improve personalized care and patient outcomes. Methods: We conducted virtual interviews with 81 US residents with at least 1 physician-confirmed IgE-mediated FA. Interviews lasted up to 60 minutes. All participants were required to self-report a history of severe allergic reactions. Recruitment was via social media, health care providers, and patient advocacy organizations. Results: Most participants had multiple FAs, with peanuts and/or tree nuts (86%) being the most common. Common reaction types were skin/mouth (91%), respiratory (65%), and gastrointestinal (53%). Key diagnosis pathways included seeking urgent/emergency care after severe reactions and discussing moderate symptoms with primary care doctors. Barriers to diagnosis included long allergist wait times, travel, and other commitments. Most participants with epinephrine autoinjectors felt confident using them due to prior training. FA impacts varied, from minor daily disruptions to significant emotional, social, educational, and career challenges, mainly due to allergen avoidance efforts. Most participants (59%) showed an interest in clinical trials, influenced by potential risks and benefits, trial type, location, accessibility, and child willingness. Despite valuing epinephrine autoinjectors, participants noted unmet needs such as inconvenience, high costs, short expiration dates, and shortages. Desired treatment benefits included proactive treatments enabling allergen ingestion without symptoms and more information on FA management. Conclusions: This study offers insights into the diverse needs of IgE-mediated FA patients, highlighting the importance of comprehensive clinician awareness to enhance personalized care, optimize patient experiences, and improve outcomes. Addressing financial barriers and unmet needs through a team approach, clear communication, psychosocial support, and accessible resources is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.