Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487321›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2025

Outside the box: comparative stem cell insights for fertility biotechnology and conservation.

Ashlee M Hutchinson, Antonia Weberling, Yoshinori Endo, Rhishikesh Bargaje

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Oogenesis and germinal bed morphology of the brown anole (A. sagrei).Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Article
  3. Male germ cell technologies in large animals.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  4. Oogenesis and germinal bed morphology of the brown anole (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashlee M HutchinsonRevive & Restore, Sausalito, California.
Antonia WeberlingAll Souls College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Yoshinori EndoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Rhishikesh BargajeConception Bioscience, Berkeley, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leveraging comparative biology could lead to breakthrough discoveries in the development of fertility technologies while supporting conservation efforts. Here, we discuss examples and opportunities to learn from stem cell systems in nontraditional animal models, primarily from the amniote phylum, focusing on challenges and insights in the in vitro derivation of primordial germ cells and gametes, as well as the promise of gonadal stem cells. Embryo models and organoid systems provide a further opportunity to explore germ cell specification and maturation within a proxy 'in vivo' context. Additionally, stem cells enable high-throughput molecular studies to explore the mechanisms underlying fertility-related diseases. Using the international effort to derive gametes from stem cells of the Northern White Rhino as a case study, we highlight the contribution of alternative mammalian systems within the field of assisted reproductive treatments and point toward promising directions for future research. Contextualizing stem cell derivation and differentiation within a comparative species framework will be essential for harnessing the full potential of reproductive technologies for human fertility while simultaneously opening new frontiers in wildlife conservation.

Indexed as

biodiversitycomparative biologyconservationin vitro gametogenesisStem cell

Identifiers

PMID40487321
PMCPMC12139218

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.