Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487323›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2025

Basic biology is not just "for the birds": how avian studies have informed us about vertebrate reproduction.

George E Bentley, Sayaka Aizawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

George E BentleyDepartment of Integrative Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Sayaka AizawaDepartment of Integrative Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avian reproductive physiology has been studied for centuries, largely because of the importance of birds as food animals. It is likely that the ubiquity and ease of access to domesticated chickens led to them being used in some of the first experiments on transplantation of endocrine structures-in this case, the testes. Since then, study of seasonal changes in reproductive physiology (photoperiodism) in different orders of bird species has led to advances in the understanding of endocrine regulation of reproductive physiology and behavior. These include mechanisms of adult neuroplasticity, sexual selection, sperm competition, stress physiology, and circadian physiology. Here, we focus mainly on the discovery in birds of a neuropeptide named gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone that mostly has inhibitory effects on reproduction. This hormone has since been shown to exist in all mammals studied to date, including humans (it is known as RFamide-related peptide in mammals). We discuss the history and implications of avian studies on gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone/RFamide-related peptide for human reproductive biology.

Indexed as

GnIHGnRHRFamide

Identifiers

PMID40487323
PMCPMC12139251

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.