Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487326›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2025

Connecting microbial ecology to human fertility and reproduction: perspectives from the reproductive microbiomes of animals.

Sally L Bornbusch, Katherine A Dami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sally L BornbuschCenter for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institution, Washington, D.C.
Katherine A DamiAnimal Care Sciences, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institution, Washington, D.C.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In all vertebrates, reproduction occurs in the context of host-associated microbiomes, which are increasingly recognized for their contributions to reproductive success. Although host-associated microbiomes are species specific, synthesizing patterns in microbial ecology across human and animal taxa provides perspectives for understanding the factors that shape microbial communities and their contributions to reproduction. Additionally, the fertility and reproductive physiology of animals under human care-particularly endangered species-is often meticulously monitored to maximize reproductive opportunities. In this mini-review, we examine current knowledge on reproductive microbiomes in animals, focusing, when available, on the sparse literature for wildlife species. We suggest ways in which studying animal microbial ecology may advance human fertility and reproduction by focusing on 3 microbial communities-vaginal, milk, and seminal microbiomes-which represent a large portion of literature and have clear implications for reproductive health. We identify avenues of future research that will further strengthen the linkages between reproductive research in wildlife species and humans and provide potential guidelines for practical applications of microbiome science to human reproductive health.

Indexed as

animalcomparativemicrobial ecologyMicrobiotareproduction

Identifiers

PMID40487326
PMCPMC12139248

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.