Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487363›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Modelling low-dimensional interacting brain networks reveals organising principle in human cognition.

Yonatan Sanz Perl, Sebastian Geli, Eider Pérez-Ordoyo, Lou Zonca, Sebastian Idesis, Jakub Vohryzek, Viktor K Jirsa, Morten L Kringelbach, Enzo Tagliazucchi, Gustavo Deco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Structured Dynamics in the Algorithmic Agent.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yonatan Sanz PerlCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-5564
Sebastian GeliCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Eider Pérez-OrdoyoCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Lou ZoncaCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Sebastian IdesisCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Jakub VohryzekCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Viktor K JirsaInstitut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Morten L KringelbachDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Enzo TagliazucchiNational Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gustavo DecoCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of resting-state networks shifted the focus from the role of local regions in cognitive tasks to the ongoing spontaneous dynamics in global networks. Recently, efforts have been invested to reduce the complexity of brain activity recordings through the application of nonlinear dimensionality reduction algorithms. Here, we investigate how the interaction between these networks emerges as an organising principle in human cognition. We combine deep variational autoencoders with computational modelling to construct a dynamical model of brain networks fitted to the whole-brain dynamics measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Crucially, this allows us to infer the interaction between these networks in resting state and seven different cognitive tasks by determining the effective functional connectivity between networks. We found a high flexible reconfiguration of task-driven network interaction patterns and we demonstrate that this reconfiguration can be used to classify different cognitive tasks. Importantly, compared with using all the nodes in a parcellation, we obtain better results by modelling the dynamics of interacting networks in both model and classification performance. These findings show the key causal role of manifolds as a fundamental organising principle of brain function, providing evidence that interacting networks are the computational engines' brain during cognitive tasks.

Indexed as

Human cognitionLow-dimensional manifoldNonequilibrium dynamicsWhole-brain modelling

Identifiers

PMID40487363
PMCPMC12140577

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.