ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Modelling low-dimensional interacting brain networks reveals organising principle in human cognition.
Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychedelics align brain activity with context.Nature · 2026Article
- Structured Dynamics in the Algorithmic Agent.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Precision neurodiversity: personalized brain network architecture as a window into cognitive variability.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discovery of resting-state networks shifted the focus from the role of local regions in cognitive tasks to the ongoing spontaneous dynamics in global networks. Recently, efforts have been invested to reduce the complexity of brain activity recordings through the application of nonlinear dimensionality reduction algorithms. Here, we investigate how the interaction between these networks emerges as an organising principle in human cognition. We combine deep variational autoencoders with computational modelling to construct a dynamical model of brain networks fitted to the whole-brain dynamics measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Crucially, this allows us to infer the interaction between these networks in resting state and seven different cognitive tasks by determining the effective functional connectivity between networks. We found a high flexible reconfiguration of task-driven network interaction patterns and we demonstrate that this reconfiguration can be used to classify different cognitive tasks. Importantly, compared with using all the nodes in a parcellation, we obtain better results by modelling the dynamics of interacting networks in both model and classification performance. These findings show the key causal role of manifolds as a fundamental organising principle of brain function, providing evidence that interacting networks are the computational engines' brain during cognitive tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.