ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2025
An evidence-based framework for postoperative surveillance of meningioma.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sexual function and activity in young adults with a primary brain tumor-A population-based longitudinal study.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
- Trends in Meningioma Incidence, Treatment, and Imaging Surveillance.JAMA oncology · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary management of meningiomas in the era of precision oncology.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Prognostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Defined Extent of Surgical Resection in Dogs With Intracranial Meningiomas.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2026Article
- Extent of resection and adjuvant radiotherapy in intracranial anaplastic meningioma: improved disease control with no statistically significant overall survival benefit.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Salmonella-Induced Immunothrombosis: An Unusual Case of Pulmonary Embolism in the Setting of Enteric Infection.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Meningiomas frequently recur after surgery. Existing guidelines for postoperative surveillance are based on customary practices or limited data. This may result in excessive or inadequate surveillance. Methods: We compared 8 studies involving 1519 resected meningiomas with postoperative follow-up ranging from 7 to 23 years. Meningiomas were stratified using the World Health Organization and Simpson grading systems, and progression-free survival data were compared. Recurrence patterns were validated using 2 additional studies involving 2463 meningiomas. Results: Incompletely resected meningiomas of all grades displayed recurrences throughout the observation period. The 5-year and 10-year cumulative incidence of recurrence for completely resected Grade 1 meningiomas was 10% and 20%, with no recurrences beyond 11 years. For completely resected Grade 2 meningiomas, the 5-year and 10-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 24% and 50%, with ongoing recurrences throughout the observation period. Elevated recurrence rates for Grade 1/2 meningiomas persisted beyond 5 years. For completely resected Grade 3 meningiomas, the 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 63%, and all recurred before 10 years. Conclusions: Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 48 h to determine the extent of resection and at 4 months to detect rapid regrowth is recommended. For completely resected Grade 1 meningiomas, annual MRI followed by discontinuation of surveillance if there is no recurrence after 11 years is reasonable. For completely resected Grade 2 meningiomas, annual MRI indefinitely is recommended. For Grade 3 meningiomas, MRI every 3-4 months for 2 years, followed by every 6 months indefinitely, is recommended. Incompletely resected meningiomas should be followed indefinitely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.