Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40487987›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025

Leveraging machine learning in nursing: innovations, challenges, and ethical insights.

Sophie So Wan Yip, Sheng Ning, Niki Yan Ki Wong, Jeffrey Chan, Kei Shing Ng, Bernadette Oi Ting Kwok, Robert L Anders, Simon Ching Lam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sophie So Wan YipSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sheng NingSchool of Computer Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Niki Yan Ki WongSchool of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jeffrey ChanDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Kei Shing NgDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Bernadette Oi Ting KwokDepartment of Ocean Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Robert L AndersSchool of Nursing, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, United States.
Simon Ching LamSchool of Nursing, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim/objective: This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the integration of machine learning (ML) (1) in nursing by exploring its implications on patient care, nursing practices, and healthcare delivery. It highlights current applications, challenges, ethical considerations, and the potential future developments of ML in nursing. Background: With the advent of ML in healthcare, the nursing profession stands on the cusp of a transformative era. Despite the technological advancements, discussions on the utilization of ML in nursing, which are crucial for advancing the profession, are lacking. This review seeks to fill this gap by examining the balance between technological innovation and the human-centric nature of nursing. Design: This narrative review employs a detailed search strategy across several databases, including PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. It focuses on articles that were published from January 2019 to December 2023. Moreover, this review aims to illustrate the current use, challenges, and future potential of ML applications in nursing. Methods: Inclusion criteria targeted articles that focus on ML application in nursing, challenges, ethical considerations, and future directions. Exclusion criteria omitted opinion pieces and nonrelevant studies. Articles were categorized into themes, such as patient care, nursing education, operational efficiency, ethical considerations, and future potential, thus facilitating a structured analysis. Results: Findings demonstrate that ML has significantly enhanced patient monitoring, predictive analytics, and preventive care. For example, the COMPOSER deep learning model for early sepsis prediction was associated with a 1.9% absolute reduction (17% relative decrease) in in-hospital sepsis mortality and a 5.0% absolute increase (10% relative increase) in sepsis bundle compliance. In nursing education, ML has improved simulation-based training by facilitating adaptive learning experiences that support continual skill development. Furthermore, ML contributes to operational efficiency through automated staffing optimization and administrative task automation, thus reducing nurse workload and enhancing patient care outcomes. However, key challenges include ethical considerations, such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and patient autonomy, which necessitate ongoing research and regulatory oversight. Conclusions: ML in nursing offers transformative potential across patient care, education, and operational efficiency, which is balanced by significant challenges and ethical considerations. Future directions include expanding clinical and community applications, integrating emerging technologies, and enhancing nursing education. Continuous research, ethical oversight, and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential for harnessing ML's full potential in nursing to ensure that its advancements improve patient outcomes and support nursing professionals without compromising core nursing values.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedigital healthethical considerationsinterdisciplinary collaborationmachine learningpredictive analytics

Identifiers

PMID40487987
PMCPMC12141303

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.