Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40488106›Full record

ReviewAPL bioengineering2025

Advanced biomaterial strategies for overcoming age-associated wound healing impairments.

Rodrigo Dores, Telma A Rodrigues, Daniel Carvalho, Eva Batista, Myroslava Kozak, Cristina Blanco-Elices, Hugo Fernandes, Luis M Bimbo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in APL bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Polysaccharide based biomaterials for advanced wound healing applications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eva BatistaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2726-5896
Myroslava KozakDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9169-4595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dermal wounds represent a substantial global healthcare burden, with significant economic impact and reduced quality of life for affected individuals. As skin ages, the wound healing capacity is significantly diminished through multiple pathways, including reduced cellular proliferation, altered inflammatory responses, impaired vascularization, and decreased extracellular matrix production. With worldwide demographics shifting toward an older population, effective wound management has become an increasingly critical healthcare challenge. Biomaterials have emerged as a powerful tool to address the specific challenges of wound healing by providing structural support and delivering therapeutic agents to facilitate tissue regeneration. These materials can even be engineered to match the specific mechanical properties of aged tissue while simultaneously releasing key age-tailored bioactive molecules, thereby addressing the complex healing deficits in aged skin. Recent advances in aged skin models have established them as crucial platforms for translational research, enabling more accurate prediction of biomaterial performance in elderly patients. Concurrently, composite biomaterials, which combine multiple functionalities in a single platform, have gained prominence as particularly promising clinical solutions. Though significant progress has been made, challenges persist in optimizing material properties and achieving reproducible clinical outcomes, demanding continued research focused specifically on age-related wound healing impairments.

Identifiers

PMID40488106
PMCPMC12145203

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.