ReviewThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2025
Incretin Receptor Agonism, Fat-free Mass, and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Narrative Review.
Review in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- GLP-1-Based Therapies in Pain Medicine: A Narrative Review and Expert Opinion on Obesity-Related Low Back and Knee Pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Association between fibrinogen and decline in cardiorespiratory fitness in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing: a large cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond Weight Loss: Optimizing GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextIndividuals with obesity often exhibit low muscle quality and are at risk of reduced muscle mass and diminished cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and dual GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist (GLP-1/GIPRA) promote significant loss in adipose tissue but are also associated with notable reductions in fat-free mass (FFM). It is not yet understood how these drugs affect CRF, which is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. EVIDENCE DESCRIPTION: People with obesity frequently have low CRF, which is defined by the Fick principle-the product of cardiac output and peripheral oxygen extraction. Cardiovascular dysfunction and reduced muscle quality, due to lipid infiltration, relatively low muscle mass, and dysfunctional microvasculature, work in concert to affect the determinants of the Fick equation and cause low CRF in this population. Weight loss interventions, including GLP-1RAs and dual GLP-1/GIPRA, may improve these measures. However, recent trials show GLP-1RAs and dual GLP-1/GIPRA therapy accelerates FFM loss. Evidence indicates that approximately 25% to 40% of weight loss attributed to GLP-1RAs and dual GLP-1/GIPRA comes from FFM loss, a rate far exceeding the annual age-related decline of FFM in adults. While these therapies have revolutionized obesity and glycemic management by inducing significant weight loss, reducing blood glucose levels, and demonstrating cardiovascular benefits in individuals with or without type 2 diabetes, clinical studies have failed to show improvements in CRF, a critical determinant of long-term cardiovascular health, and the long-term implications of FFM loss in these individuals remain unknown.
conclusionGLP-1RAs and dual GLP-1/GIPRA significantly reduce body weight and adiposity, along with a substantial FFM loss but with no clear evidence of CRF enhancement. Further research is needed to elucidate the complex interplay among GLP-1 and dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonism, FFM, direct cardiovascular measures, and determinants of CRF to optimize clinical outcomes in obesity and type 2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.