Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40488434›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025

Development of Survey Measures of Uncontrolled Vaping and Vaping Restraint.

Ebbie Kalan, Tara Licciardello Queen, Jennifer Mendel Sheldon, Marissa G Hall, Paschal J Sheeran, Kurt M Ribisl, Noel T Brewer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ebbie KalanDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7709-5392
Tara Licciardello QueenDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jennifer Mendel SheldonDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Marissa G HallDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Paschal J SheeranLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kurt M RibislDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Noel T BrewerDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

NIH HHS R01-CA246606-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSome e-cigarette users experience uncontrolled vaping, defined as using vapes more than preferred. Because validated measures of this experience are lacking, this study aimed to develop and validate scales measuring uncontrolled vaping and vaping restraint among US adults and youth.

methodsWe developed new survey measures of uncontrolled vaping and vaping restraint based on qualitative research and refined them after cognitive interviews. In Study 1, we used data from a convenience sample of 950 US adult e-cigarette users to establish psychometrically sound scales. In Study 2, we used data from a nationally representative sample of 1,138 US adolescents and adults to finalize the scales.

resultsStudy 1 produced reliable scales for uncontrolled vaping perception (five items), uncontrolled vaping consequences (four items), and vaping restraint (four items) (αs = .87-.93). Convergent and criterion validity were demonstrated by stronger associations of uncontrolled vaping with use behaviors (median r = .65 vs. .39) and somewhat weaker associations with measures of limiting use (median r = .44 vs. .51). Higher vaping restraint scores were associated with measures of limiting use (r = .46 to .59) and quit intentions (r = .23 to .48). Study 2 confirmed these results and further refined the scales to three items each.

conclusionThe newly developed scales for uncontrolled vaping and vaping restraint demonstrated sound psychometric properties in both convenience and nationally representative samples. These measures can inform e-cigarette regulatory actions and guide the development of vaping management and cessation approaches. IMPLICATIONS: This study introduces reliable and valid scales to measure uncontrolled vaping perceptions, uncontrolled vaping consequences, and vaping restraint among e-cigarette users. These tools provide a nuanced understanding of vaping behaviors, distinguishing internal perceptions of overuse from external consequences such as feedback from others or interference with daily activities. By capturing these dimensions, the scales offer insights beyond traditional nicotine dependence measures, supporting research and interventions tailored to vaping-specific challenges. The findings highlight the importance of addressing uncontrolled vaping through regulatory and clinical efforts, informing strategies to reduce excessive vaping, and promoting self-regulation among e-cigarette users.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsVapingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40488434
PMCPMC12641170

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.