Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40488918›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2025

Navigating Endoscopic Surveillance and Management of Barrett's Esophagus in Elderly Patients: Balancing the Risks and Benefits.

Natalie J Wilson, Cary C Cotton, Nicholas J Shaheen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalie J WilsonDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Cary C CottonDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Nicholas J ShaheenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. nshaheen@med.unc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review examines the current evidence and practical considerations for endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) in elderly patients, focusing on balancing the potential benefits and risks associated with endoscopic surveillance and eradication therapies in this population. RECENT

findingsElderly patients with BE have a higher baseline prevalence of dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Additionally, the risk of progression from BE to EAC increases with advancing age, making surveillance particularly relevant in this population. However, recent studies suggest the benefits of surveillance decline with increasing age, greater comorbidities, and reduced life expectancy. Despite increasing awareness that ongoing surveillance endoscopy may be of minimal benefit for certain patient groups, there remains a paucity of data to guide decisions regarding discontinuation of surveillance. The management of BE in elderly patients requires a careful balance between the potential benefits of endoscopic surveillance and eradication therapies and the risks and costs associated with repeated invasive procedures. Decisions to continue endoscopic surveillance in this population should be individualized, taking into account life-expectancy and comorbidities rather than focusing solely on chronological age.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyAgedAge FactorsDisease ProgressionHumansRisk AssessmentBarrett’s esophagusElderly patientsEndoscopic eradication therapyEndoscopic surveillanceEsophageal adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.