ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2025
Progress of Immune-Inducible Biomaterials for Post-Ablation Cancers.
Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progress of Immune-Inducible Biomaterials for Post-Ablation Cancers.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Locoregional ablation therapies have considerable potential in eradicating cancers by killing tumor cells directly with different mechanisms, inducing immunogenic cell death, and subsequently forming the "in situ vaccine". Nevertheless, a short period of immune time post-ablation and rapidly reversed to an immunosuppressed state, may lead to a higher chance of tumor recurrence and metastasis. Therefore, boosting the efficacy of immunity and/or prolonging the duration of organismal immunity seem to be the key to suppressing tumor progression after minimally invasive ablation therapies. Currently, a number of nanoplatforms for post-ablation immunotherapy are developed to address this challenge, including amplifying antitumor immunostimulatory signals, modulating immunosuppressive microenvironment, and improving antitumor immune responses. These approaches portend great promise for applications to improve local control and prevent tumor recurrence and distant metastasis. This review provides a concise overview of recent advances in immune-inducible biomaterials for enhancing post-ablation antitumor immunity, as well as strategies for their application in targeted drug delivery and sustained release to potentiate immune responses. Furthermore, main obstacles and potential breakthroughs for future development are discussed and prospected, providing insights to drive further innovation in immune-inducible biomaterials for post-ablation cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.