ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Brain Aging in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease From the UK Biobank.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exposome-wide patterns predict brain health in aging.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Brain age gap as biomarker linking cardiovascular diseases genetic susceptibility and causality.iScience · 2026Article
- Potential vulnerability and resilience to accelerated brain aging in women exposed to stressful life events: insights from the brain age prediction model.Neurobiology of stress · 2025Article
- Biological heart and brain ageing in subjects with cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain undergoes complex but normal structural changes during the aging process in healthy adults, whereas deviations from the normal aging patterns of the brain can be indicative of various conditions as well as an increased risk for the development of diseases. The brain age gap (BAG), which is defined as the difference between the chronological age and the machine learning-predicted biological age of an individual, is a promising biomarker for determining whether an individual deviates from normal brain aging patterns. While the BAG has shown promise for various neurological diseases and cardiovascular risk factors, its utility to quantify brain changes associated with diagnosed cardiovascular diseases has not been investigated to date, which is the aim of this study. T1-weighted MRI scans from healthy participants in the UK Biobank were used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for biological brain age prediction. The trained model was then used to quantify and compare the BAGs for all participants in the UK Biobank with known cardiovascular diseases, as well as healthy controls and patients with known neurological diseases for benchmark comparisons. Saliency maps were computed for each individual to investigate whether brain regions used for biological brain age prediction by the CNN differ between groups. The analyses revealed significant differences in BAG distributions for 10 of the 42 sex-specific cardiovascular disease groups investigated compared to healthy participants, indicating disease-specific variations in brain aging. However, no significant differences were found regarding the brain regions used for brain age prediction as determined by saliency maps, indicating that the model mostly relied on healthy brain aging patterns, even in the presence of cardiovascular diseases. Overall, the findings of this work demonstrate that the BAG is a sensitive imaging biomarker to detect differences in brain aging associated with specific cardiovascular diseases. This further supports the theory of the heart-brain axis by exemplifying that many cardiovascular diseases are associated with atypical brain aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.