ArticlePloS one2025
Prediction of air temperature and humidity in greenhouses via artificial neural network.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strict Recursive Closed-Loop Evaluation of Greenhouse Air Temperature Forecasting with Generated Exogenous Variables and Exogenous-Error Propagation Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of greenhouse temperature and relative humidity is critical for developing environmental control systems. Effective regulation strategies can help improve crop yields while reducing energy consumption. In this study, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF) networks were used for short-term prediction of temperature and relative humidity in a double-film greenhouse. The prediction models used indoor soil temperature, light intensity, and historical measurements of temperature and humidity from the previous 10 minutes as inputs. Results show that the MLP model with Levenberg-Marquardt optimization performs best in predicting the current temperature and humidity, with an RMSE of 0.439°C and R2 of 0.997 for temperature prediction and an RMSE of 1.141% and R2 of 0.996 for relative humidity prediction. For 30-minute short-term prediction, the Bayesian optimized RBF model showed better temperature prediction with an RMSE of 1.579°C and an R2 of 0.958, while the MLP model performed better in relative humidity prediction with an RMSE of 4.299% and an R2 of 0.948. This study provides theoretical support for advancing the intelligent regulation of greenhouse environmental factors in cold and arid regions, and the application of predictive models to intelligent environmental management systems could help optimize cultivation practices and energy efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.