Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40489847›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

An effective and validated prognostic model for uterine corpus endometrial cancer based on gene main effects and gene-gene interactions.

Yujing Han, Yingqin Huang, Deyi Luo

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yujing HanPelvic Diseases Center, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0009-0008-9622-0804
Yingqin Huang
Deyi Luo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) poses a significant to women's health. Accurate prediction of prognosis plays a crucial role in facilitating clinical decision-making processes. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a robust prognostic model based on gene expression profile. Gene expression profile of 546 UCEC samples of The Cancer Genome Atlas were retrieved. A multi-step strategy was employed to develop and validate a prognostic model predicting all-cause mortality rates. Receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis were performed to assess the predictive accuracy and net benefit of the model. Besides, model-associated immunological features were explored. The UCEC Prognostic Model (TUPM) performed well in identifying patients at high mortality risk. Patients with risk scores above the upper quartile had significantly decreased overall survival compared to patients with risk scores below the lower quartile (HR = 12.56, CI95: 4.629-34.09, P = 6.76E-7), indicating a prominent discriminability. The model accurately predicted patient survival from 1 to 5-year (area under the curve [AUC]1-year = 0.766, AUC2-year = 0.816, AUC3-year = 0.764, AUC4-year = 0.783, AUC5-year = 0.814) and provided excellent calibration. Meanwhile, The UCEC Prognostic Model encompassing transcriptome scores yielded a higher net clinical benefit than the baseline model that only included patient age and clinical stage. Furthermore, the prolonged survival in the low-risk group may be associated with increased infiltration of follicular T cells and regulatory T cells in the tumor microenvironment. We have developed a robust prognostic model for UCEC that may provide preliminary evidence for individualized management and treatment modality decision.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsAgedFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk AssessmentROC CurveTranscriptomegene–gene interactionsgene main effectsprognostic modeluterine corpus endometrial cancer

Identifiers

PMID40489847
PMCPMC12151026

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.