ArticleMedicine2025
An effective and validated prognostic model for uterine corpus endometrial cancer based on gene main effects and gene-gene interactions.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) poses a significant to women's health. Accurate prediction of prognosis plays a crucial role in facilitating clinical decision-making processes. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a robust prognostic model based on gene expression profile. Gene expression profile of 546 UCEC samples of The Cancer Genome Atlas were retrieved. A multi-step strategy was employed to develop and validate a prognostic model predicting all-cause mortality rates. Receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis were performed to assess the predictive accuracy and net benefit of the model. Besides, model-associated immunological features were explored. The UCEC Prognostic Model (TUPM) performed well in identifying patients at high mortality risk. Patients with risk scores above the upper quartile had significantly decreased overall survival compared to patients with risk scores below the lower quartile (HR = 12.56, CI95: 4.629-34.09, P = 6.76E-7), indicating a prominent discriminability. The model accurately predicted patient survival from 1 to 5-year (area under the curve [AUC]1-year = 0.766, AUC2-year = 0.816, AUC3-year = 0.764, AUC4-year = 0.783, AUC5-year = 0.814) and provided excellent calibration. Meanwhile, The UCEC Prognostic Model encompassing transcriptome scores yielded a higher net clinical benefit than the baseline model that only included patient age and clinical stage. Furthermore, the prolonged survival in the low-risk group may be associated with increased infiltration of follicular T cells and regulatory T cells in the tumor microenvironment. We have developed a robust prognostic model for UCEC that may provide preliminary evidence for individualized management and treatment modality decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.