ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Comparison of QM Methods for the Evaluation of Halogen-π Interactions for Large-Scale Data Generation.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Descriptions of π/π, CH/π, and Halogen/π Interactions Formed between Phenyl Substructures.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- Expanding and Enhancing Neural Network-Based QM-AI Models for the Accurate Prediction of Halogen-π Interaction Energies in Protein Contexts.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- A QM-AI Approach for the Acceleration of Accurate Assessments of Halogen-π Interactions by Training Neural Networks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Halogen-π interactions play a pivotal role in molecular recognition processes, drug design, and therapeutic strategies, providing unique opportunities for enhancing and fine-tuning the binding affinity and specificity of pharmaceutical agents. The present study systematically benchmarks various combinations of quantum mechanical (QM) methods and basis sets to characterize halogen-π interactions in model systems. We evaluate both density functional theory (DFT) methods and wave function-based post-HF methods in terms of accuracy to reference calculations at the CCSD(T)/CBS level of theory and runtime efficiency. By balancing these crucial aspects, we aim to identify an optimal configuration suitable for high-throughput applications. Our results indicate that MP2 using the reasonably large TZVPP basis set is in excellent agreement with reference calculations, striking a balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. This allows us to generate large, reliable data sets, which will serve as a basis to develop and train machine-learning models capable of accurately capturing the strength of halogen-π interactions, thereby providing a robust data-driven foundation for medicinal chemistry analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.