Evidence mapPaperPMID 40490689Full record

SynthesisBMC primary care2025

Opportunities, challenges, and requirements for Artificial Intelligence (AI) implementation in Primary Health Care (PHC): a systematic review.

Farzaneh Yousefi, Reza Dehnavieh, Maude Laberge, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Mohammad Mehdi Ghaemi, Mohsen Nadali, Najmeh Azizi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. AI-powered tools in family medicine: Bridging technology and practice.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Artificial intelligence in preventive care in primary health care settings: a scoping review.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Farzaneh YousefiDepartment of Management, Policy and Health Economics, Faculty of Medical Information and Management, Candidate in Health Services Management, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Reza DehnaviehHealth Foresight and Innovation Research Center, , Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. rdehnavi@gmail.com.
Maude LabergeFaculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Marie-Pierre GagnonCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, Canada.
Mohammad Mehdi GhaemiMedical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Mohsen NadaliMaster of Business Administration, Mehralborz University, Tehran, Iran.
Najmeh AziziDepartment of Management, Policy and Health Economics, Faculty of Medical Information and Management, Student in Health Services Management, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly reshaped Primary Health Care (PHC), offering various possibilities and complexities across all functional dimensions. The objective is to review and synthesize available evidence on the opportunities, challenges, and requirements of AI implementation in PHC based on the Primary Care Evaluation Tool (PCET).

methodsWe conducted a systematic review, following the Cochrane Collaboration method, to identify the latest evidence regarding AI implementation in PHC. A comprehensive search across eight databases- PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Embase, CINAHL, IEEE, and Cochrane was conducted using MeSH terms alongside the SPIDER framework to pinpoint quantitative and qualitative literature published from 2000 to 2024. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, guided by the SPIDER framework, to review full texts and extract data. We synthesized extracted data from the study characteristics, opportunities, challenges, and requirements, employing thematic-framework analysis, according to the PCET model. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the JBI critical appraisal tools.

resultsIn this review, we included a total of 109 articles, most of which were conducted in North America (n = 49, 44%), followed by Europe (n = 36, 33%). The included studies employed a diverse range of study designs. Using the PCET model, we categorized AI-related opportunities, challenges, and requirements across four key dimensions. The greatest opportunities for AI integration in PHC were centered on enhancing comprehensive service delivery, particularly by improving diagnostic accuracy, optimizing screening programs, and advancing early disease prediction. However, the most challenges emerged within the stewardship and resource generation functions, with key concerns related to data security and privacy, technical performance issues, and limitations in data accessibility. Ensuring successful AI integration requires a robust stewardship function, strategic investments in resource generation, and a collaborative approach that fosters co-development, scientific advancements, and continuous evaluation.

conclusionsSuccessful AI integration in PHC requires a coordinated, multidimensional approach, with stewardship, resource generation, and financing playing key roles in enabling service delivery. Addressing existing knowledge gaps, examining interactions among these dimensions, and fostering a collaborative approach in developing AI solutions among stakeholders are essential steps toward achieving an equitable and efficient AI-driven PHC system. PROTOCOL: Registered in Open Science Framework (OSF) ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HG2DV ).

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePrimary Health CareHumansAI in HealthAI in PHCAI in Primary Health CareArtificial IntelligencePrimary Health CareSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40490689
PMCPMC12147259

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.