Evidence mapPaperPMID 40490741Full record

Trial reportBMC primary care2025

Primary care practices' choice of implementation strategy for continuous glucose monitoring for patients with diabetes: a multiple methods study within a larger hybrid type-3 effectiveness-implementation study.

Kimberly T Wiggins, Tristen L Hall, Bonnie Jortberg, W Perry Dickinson, L Miriam Dickinson, Jessica A Parascando, Douglas H Fernald, Chelsea Sobczak, Sean M Oser, Tamara K Oser

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05336214 (PRimary Care Education and Practice Adoption Resource Evaluation for Continuous Glucose Monitoring), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05336214 nacompletednot on this map

PRimary Care Education and Practice Adoption Resource Evaluation for Continuous Glucose Monitoring

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2022 to 2024Enrolled190ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Continuous Glucose MonitoringArmsVirtual CGM initiation service, Online educational module on CGM, Practice facilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond Coverage Expansion: Exploring Persistent Barriers to CGM Utilization in the Clinical Environment.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kimberly T WigginsDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop F496, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045- 0508, USA. kimberly.wiggins@cuanschutz.edu.
Tristen L HallDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop F496, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045- 0508, USA.
Bonnie JortbergDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop F496, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045- 0508, USA.
W Perry DickinsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop F496, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045- 0508, USA.
L Miriam DickinsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop F496, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045- 0508, USA.
Jessica A ParascandoDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop F496, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045- 0508, USA.
Douglas H FernaldDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop F496, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045- 0508, USA.
Chelsea SobczakDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop F496, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045- 0508, USA.
Sean M OserDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop F496, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045- 0508, USA.
Tamara K OserDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop F496, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045- 0508, USA.

Funding

NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost diabetes care occurs in primary care. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is associated with clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial benefits. While CGM uptake in primary care is increasing, understanding models to support CGM use in diverse primary care practices is needed. The PREPARE 4 CGM study evaluated strategies to implement CGM in primary care. We compared characteristics among practices choosing a practice-led, self-paced CGM implementation strategy or referral to a virtual CGM implementation service that provided patients and their referring primary care practices CGM initiation and data interpretation support for at least six months.

methodsColorado PC practices interested in implementing CGM enrolled and chose to use the American Academy of Family Physicians Transformation in Practice Series (TIPS): CGM implementation modules or refer patients to a virtual CGM initiation and education service designed and staffed by a primary care multi-disciplinary team. In this multiple methods study, baseline practice characteristics were compared across study arms using chi-square and t-tests. Semi-structured interviews with practice members provided additional context to explain study arm selection.

resultsOf 76 practices enrolled, 46 chose self-paced implementation using TIPS modules, 16 of which (35%) had a diabetes care and education specialist (DCES) in the practice; of the 30 that chose the virtual CGM initiation service, none (0%) had a DCES, X

conclusionsPrimary care practices were eager to implement CGM. All practices with a DCES chose to implement CGM on their own; of the practices without a DCES, implementation method selection was evenly split (half chose to implement on their own, half chose virCIS). DCESs may have potential as diabetes technology champions in primary care practices. Referral to the virtual CGM implementation service allowed access to a certified DCES and multidisciplinary team for practices without them. As many practices without a DCES also chose to implement CGM on their own, multiple models may be necessary to foster CGM implementation in primary care.

trial registrationThis project was reviewed and approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB; Protocol 21-4269) and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on March 23, 2022 (NCT05336214).

Indexed as

Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes MellitusPrimary Health CareBlood GlucoseColoradoContinuous Glucose MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseContinuous glucose monitoringDiabetes education and care specialistDiabetes mellitus, type 1Diabetes mellitus, type 2Diabetes technologyPrimary health careWearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID40490741
PMCPMC12147341

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.