Evidence mapPaperPMID 40490965Full record

ReviewBiology of the cell2025

The Different Cellular Entry Routes for Drug Delivery Using Cell Penetrating Peptides.

Michael Okafor, David Schmitt, Stéphane Ory, Stéphane Gasman, Christelle Hureau, Peter Faller, Nicolas Vitale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of the cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael OkaforInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives-CNRS UPR3212, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0975-1225
David SchmittInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives-CNRS UPR3212, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Stéphane OryInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives-CNRS UPR3212, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4359-1157
Stéphane GasmanInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives-CNRS UPR3212, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8415-1276
Christelle HureauLaboratoire de Chimie de Coordination-CNRS UPR8241, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3339-0239
Peter FallerInstitut de Chimie-UMR7177, Université de Strasbourg/CNRS, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8013-0806
Nicolas VitaleInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives-CNRS UPR3212, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-4907

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell plasma membrane acts as a semi-permeable barrier essential for cellular protection and function, posing a challenge for therapeutic molecule delivery. Conventional techniques for crossing this barrier, including biophysical and biochemical methods, often exhibit limitations such as cytotoxicity and the risk of genomic integration when viral vectors are involved. In contrast, cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) offer a promising non-invasive means to deliver a broad range of molecular cargoes, including proteins, nucleic acids and small molecules, into cells. CPPs, typically 5 to 30 amino acids long and rich in basic or non-polar residues, interact favourably with different cell membranes. These peptides have evolved since the discovery of the HIV-1 TAT peptide in the 1980s, expanding into various CPP families with diverse therapeutic applications. CPPs can form covalent or non-covalent complexes with their cargo, influencing their stability and efficacy. Based on their sequence properties and interactions, CPPs can be amphipathic or non-amphipathic, with distinct mechanisms of membrane penetration, such as direct penetration and endocytosis. While their uptake mechanisms are complex and not fully elucidated, ongoing optimization aims to enhance CPP specificity and efficacy. CPPs have demonstrated potential in drug delivery, gene therapy, cancer treatment and vaccine development, addressing key safety and efficiency concerns associated with viral vectors. This review explores the classification, mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential. It focuses on the intracellular vesicular trafficking of CPPs, highlighting their role as transformative tools in advancing cellular therapies and medical treatments.

Indexed as

Cell-Penetrating PeptidesDrug Delivery SystemsAnimalsCell MembraneEndocytosisHumansCell-Penetrating Peptidescell penetrating peptidesendocytosisendosomesmacropinocytosismembrane penetration

Identifiers

PMID40490965
PMCPMC12149500

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.