ArticleJournal of sleep research2026
Long-Term Visual Gist Abstraction Independent of Post-Encoding Sleep.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-Term Visual Gist Abstraction Independent of Post-Encoding Sleep.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current theories of memory processing postulate a slow transformation from episodic to abstract, gist-like memories. We previously demonstrated that sleep shortly after learning improves gist abstraction in healthy volunteers across a one-year retention interval using a visual version of the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. Here, we investigate the temporal evolution of this effect by testing recognition performance on a similar DRM task immediately after encoding, as well as 1 week and 1 year later. Moreover, we address the role of feature overlap during encoding, using stimulus sets that are either closely related to or more distant from their common prototype. Behavioural data were obtained from N = 16 healthy volunteers in a within-subjects design, where different sets of shapes were learned in separate experimental sessions, followed by consolidation during day-time wakefulness or nocturnal sleep, respectively. Our results indicate high levels of (false) recognition of non-encoded prototypes for all measurement points, including after 1 year. However, in contrast to our previous findings, gist memory was not affected by whether participants slept or stayed awake during the first 12 h after encoding. Comparisons across experiments indicate that the divergent results are due to changes in task demands rendering item and gist memory traces less distinct in the present study. Our results confirm the behavioural persistence of visual gist abstraction across extended intervals. At the same time, they highlight that sleep effects on this process are highly dependent on task demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.