ReviewCureus2025
Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Value of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels in Predicting Poor Glycemic Control Among Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A ROC Curve and Decision Curve Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Role of Vitamin D Supplementation in Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Comprehensive Updated Narrative Review.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our systematic review and meta-analysis examined the proportion of vitamin D deficiency in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). We conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, and Embase, for studies published between January 2016 and March 2025. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 29 studies comprising 2516 participants were included in the final analysis. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled analysis revealed that 46% (95% CI: 34-58%) of children and adolescents with T1DM had vitamin D deficiency, with significant heterogeneity observed across studies (I² = 97.98%, p<0.01). Subgroup analysis showed geographical variations with the highest deficiency rates in Africa (74%). The definition of vitamin D deficiency also impacted results, with cutoffs of <25 ng/mL yielding the highest proportion (80%) and <12 ng/mL the lowest (14%). Despite methodological limitations, including clinical setting bias, varied study designs, and inconsistent deficiency thresholds, our findings highlight the substantial burden of vitamin D deficiency in pediatric T1DM patients. This suggests the need for routine screening and potential supplementation strategies, though further research is required to establish optimal vitamin D levels for T1DM management and determine whether supplementation could play a preventive or therapeutic role in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.