ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Building equitable health partnerships: addressing racial disparities in global health.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diplomatic roles of regional coordinators for WHO Member States.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The traditional paradigms in global health, often characterized by power imbalances similar to the racial disparities between White and Black populations, are insufficient for addressing the complex health challenges of the 21st century. These disparities not only exist within national borders but also mirror the limitations of the North-South paradigm on an international scale. This framework perpetuates systemic inequalities, undermines local agency, and neglects the valuable expertise within communities of color. The evolving landscape of global health, marked by emerging infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistance, non-communicable diseases, and climate change impacts, necessitates a paradigm shift toward partnerships based on mutual respect, shared responsibility, and equitable collaboration. This paper explores the limitations of the conventional paradigms and highlights the multifaceted benefits of a more collaborative approach. It demonstrates how equitable partnerships can enhance health security, foster innovation, and promote sustainable development across racial lines. Successful examples of equity-focused cooperation illustrate the potential of diverse partnerships in strengthening health systems and promoting knowledge sharing between White and Black communities. A new framework for health cooperation is proposed, emphasizing mutual respect, transparency, accountability, and sustainable capacity building. By recognizing the agency and expertise of Black communities, we can create a more inclusive and democratic health architecture. This shift from a charity-based mindset to one rooted in solidarity acknowledges that investing in health equity is a strategic investment in our collective future. Embracing this interconnected approach will enable us to tackle pressing racial health challenges and ensure a healthier and more equitable future for all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.