ArticleEpilepsia2025
SCN9A should not be considered an epilepsy gene; Refuting a gene-disease association.
Article in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impaired gephyrin G-domain trimerization and phase separation in a patient with developmental epileptic encephalopathy.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Natural antisense transcript Nat9a suppresses Scn9a (NaScientific reports · 2026Article
- SCN9A should not be considered an epilepsy gene; Refuting a gene-disease association.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- The Complex Etiology of Epilepsy: Genetic Analysis and HLA Association in Patients in the Middle East.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe SCN9A gene is primarily expressed in nociceptive pathways within the peripheral nervous system, and pathogenic variants are associated with human pain disorders. In recent years, several studies have proposed SCN9A as a monogenic cause of epilepsy. Our objective was to critically appraise the SCN9A-epilepsy gene-disease relationship.
methodsWe assessed "epilepsy-associated" SCN9A variants from four sources: (1) the literature up to December 2023 (n = 27), (2) epilepsy patients referred for genetic testing at a regional service in Glasgow, UK over a 5-year period (n = 30), (3) the Human Genetics Mutation Database (n = 25), and (4) ClinVar (n = 1546). The latter two are genome-wide variant databases, accepting submissions from genetic laboratories and research groups. We checked whether each SCN9A variant is present in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) V4 (a reference population database for variant interpretation), and classified its pathogenicity based on the American College of Molecular Genetics and Genomics/Association of Molecular Pathologists guidelines.
resultsOnly three SCN9A variants were classified as "likely pathogenic," of which two were identified in healthy individuals in gnomAD. A total of 1540 of the 1546 SCN9A variants in ClinVar labeled as being associated with epilepsy were also reported in association with hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy. No further clinical data were provided in 1482 of these submissions. SIGNIFICANCE: There is no convincing genetic evidence to support SCN9A as a causative epilepsy gene. As such, the inclusion of SCN9A in epilepsy genetic testing panels should be reassessed. Research centers and genetic testing laboratories should be rigorous and consistent in their submissions to variant databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.