ArticleJournal of physiology and biochemistry2025
Molecular biomarkers for the prognosis of breast cancer: role of amino acid metabolism genes.
Article in Journal of physiology and biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarkers of Cancer Metabolism and Therapeutic Response.Cancer treatment and research · 2026Review
- Genetics of epilepsy.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of precise molecular biomarkers for breast cancer prognosis holds immense potential to improve treatment outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the role of amino acid metabolism genes as predictive markers for breast cancer prognosis and their association with the immune-tumour microenvironment. By employing advanced machine learning algorithms and bioinformatics analysis techniques, the impact of amino acid metabolism-related genes (AAMRGs) on the immune status and overall survival of patients with breast cancer was examined. An AAMRG-based risk model was established to assess the prognostic significance. Validated risk models (AIMP2, IYD, and QARS1) accurately predicted patient outcomes [1 y: 0.87 (0.96-0.78); 3 y: 0.82 (0.87-0.76); 5 y: 0.80 (0.86-0.75)]. Furthermore, this study revealed evidence suggesting that QARS1 may influence breast cancer cell proliferation through methionine metabolism. This analysis provides valuable insights into the mechanisms of breast cancer, emphasizing the significance of AAMRGs as prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for optimizing personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.