ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Stochastic gene expression in proliferating cells: Differing noise intensity in single-cell and population perspectives.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of variability in cell generation times on cell-to-cell variability of protein concentrations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Stochastic Gene Expression Model with State-Dependent Protein Activation Delay.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Information and fitness in two-state systems: self-replicating individuals in a fluctuating environment.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Cyclo-stationary distributions of mRNA and Protein counts for random cell division times.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Stochastic gene expression in proliferating cells: Differing noise intensity in single-cell and population perspectives.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Optimisation of gene expression noise for cellular persistence against lethal events.Journal of theoretical biology · 2025Article
- Stochastic Gene Expression in Proliferating Cells: Differing Noise Intensity in Single-Cell and Population Perspectives.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Random fluctuations (noise) in gene expression can be studied from two complementary perspectives: following expression in a single cell over time or comparing expression between cells in a proliferating population at a given time. Here, we systematically investigated scenarios where both perspectives can lead to different levels of noise in a given gene product. We first consider a stable protein, whose concentration is diluted by cellular growth. This protein inhibits growth at high concentrations, establishing a positive feedback loop. Using a stochastic model with molecular bursting of gene products, we analytically predict and contrast the steady-state distributions of protein concentration in both frameworks. Although positive feedback amplifies the noise in expression, this amplification is much higher in the population framework compared to following a single cell over time. We also study other processes that lead to different noise levels even in the absence of such dilution-based feedback. When considering randomness in the partitioning of molecules between daughters during mitosis, we find that in the single-cell perspective, the noise in protein concentration is independent of noise in the cell cycle duration. In contrast, partitioning noise is amplified in the population perspective by increasing randomness in cell-cycle time. Overall, our results show that the single-cell framework that does not account for proliferating cells can, in some cases, underestimate the noise in gene product levels. These results have important implications for studying the inter-cellular variation of different stress-related expression programs across cell types that are known to inhibit cellular growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.