Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40495142›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025

Physical activity promotion in physical therapy, exercise therapy and other movement-based therapies: a scoping review and content analysis of intervention studies and theoretical works.

Leon Matting, Klaus Pfeifer, Gorden Sudeck, Andrés Jung, Florian Langhirt, Wolfgang Geidl

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leon MattingEducation & Health Research, Institute of Sports Science, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Tübingen, Wächterstraße 67, Tübingen, 72074, Germany.
Klaus PfeiferDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstraße 123b, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Gorden SudeckEducation & Health Research, Institute of Sports Science, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Tübingen, Wächterstraße 67, Tübingen, 72074, Germany.
Andrés JungDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstraße 123b, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Florian LanghirtEducation & Health Research, Institute of Sports Science, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Tübingen, Wächterstraße 67, Tübingen, 72074, Germany.
Wolfgang GeidlDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstraße 123b, 91058, Erlangen, Germany. wolfgang.geidl@fau.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMovement-based therapists, including physical, exercise, and sport therapists, play a key role in promoting physical activity in individuals with non-communicable diseases. However, no clear consensus exists on effective intervention approaches. This scoping review examines available intervention studies and theoretical works for physical activity promotion in movement-based therapy.

methodsIn accordance with Colquhoun et al.‘s framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO until March 31, 2024. Eligible records described physical activity-promoting concepts including interventional studies and theoretical works applicable in movement-based therapies for individuals with non-communicable diseases. Data extraction covered assessment, therapeutic content, didactic-methodological principles, and theoretical underpinnings. Interventions were categorized based on behavior change techniques (BCTs), the behavior change wheel, and a clinical reasoning model for clients behavior change. Network analysis explored relationships between therapeutic content and didactic-methodological principles.

resultsFifty-seven records met inclusion criteria; 77% were intervention studies, and 23% were theoretical works. Most concepts originated from orthopedics/rheumatology (23%), neurology (21%), and oncology (9%), while 12% were generic concepts. Across concepts, 66 biopsychosocial assessment instruments and 60 BCTs were applied (Median BCTs per concept: 11.5, range: 4–37). Key didactic-methodological principles included tailoring/individualization (n = 47), active participation (n = 39), collaborative communication (n = 21), and patient self-responsibility and independence (n = 14). Least mentioned was facilitating positive movement experiences and enjoyment of physical activity (n = 3). Network analysis identified action planning, goal setting, and feedback as central BCTs.

conclusionThis review provides an overview of 57 physical activity promotion concepts used in movement-based therapies for individuals with non-communicable diseases. Findings reveal considerable heterogeneity, highlighting diverse strategies used by movement-based therapists to influence physical activity behavior.

trial registrationOpen Science Framework (OSF), December 23, 2022 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AXZSJ ).

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapyHealth PromotionNoncommunicable DiseasesPhysical Therapy ModalitiesHumansBehavior changeBehavior change techniquesExercise therapyMovement-based therapyNon-communicable diseasesPhysical activity promotion

Identifiers

PMID40495142
PMCPMC12153217

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.