Evidence mapPaperPMID 40495360Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2025

REPRIEVE final results: What does it mean for guidelines in low- and middle-income countries?

Simiso Sokhela, Jennifer M Manne-Goehler, Samanta Lalla-Edward, Mark J Siedner, Mohammed K Ali, Andrew Hill, Aaloke Mody, Anton Pozniak, Jeremy Nel, W D Francois Venter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Simiso SokhelaWits Ezintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jennifer M Manne-GoehlerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9295-0035
Samanta Lalla-EdwardWits Ezintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Mark J SiednerDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mohammed K AliHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Andrew HillDepartment of Translational Medicine, Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK.
Aaloke ModyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, St. Louis School of Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3787-365X
Anton PozniakChelsea and Westminster Hospital and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jeremy NelDivision of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
W D Francois VenterWits Ezintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL154426NHLBI NIH HHS UH3 HL156388WDFV, MKA, MJS and SL-E are partially supported by UG3/UH3HL156388. SS, SL-E and WDFV are supported by the SAMRC. AM is partially U24HL154426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe REPRIEVE study demonstrated significant reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with pitavastatin among people living with HIV (PWH) with low to moderate cardiovascular risk. Most MACE events occurred in higher-income countries, raising important considerations for similar primary prevention interventions within HIV programmes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) as antiretrovirals become safer and as PWH age. DISCUSSION: Limited data from Africa and within REPRIEVE suggests that MACE may not be as prevalent among PWH as within other geographies. Consequently, there remain questions about the appropriateness of extrapolating REPRIEVE data to the region and whether it should motivate programmatic implementation on the continent. Moreover, glucose and lipid screening used in REPRIEVE raise concerns about additional resources for similar screening, where there is little existing infrastructure and subsequent treatment. Similarly, questions around funding priorities, and health worker resource allocation for MACE prevention, particularly in the context of competing health priorities and limited health financing, need to be addressed. Newer cardiovascular medications, with cardiac, renal, hepatic, diabetes and weight loss benefits, may have greater promise, although cost remains a major concern. Finally, successful implementation with statins or other proven interventions will be unlikely, unless systemic change within non-communicable disease health system delivery programmes occurs first. However, HIV programmes and public health systems more generally have shown themselves to be poor at screening and treating other cardiovascular risk factors, including aspects as simple as raised blood pressure, even in high-income countries, and statins remain grossly under-prescribed for primary and secondary prevention internationally.

conclusionsREPRIEVE turned a spotlight on how ill-prepared current HIV programmes are to implement the simplest and safest primary care prevention interventions for cardiometabolic disease within LMICs. As data for existing and new interventions become available, HIV delivery systems will need to raise their standard beyond simply prescribing antiretrovirals and taking viral loads.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHIV InfectionsDeveloping CountriesHumanscardiovascularHIVMACEpitavastatinREPRIEVEstatin

Identifiers

PMID40495360
PMCPMC12152196

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.