ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2025
Effects of coenzyme Q10 administration on blood pressure and heart rate in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Ginger Supplementation and Blood Pressure in Adults: A GRADE-Based Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of Probiotics and Synbiotics Supplementation on Blood Pressure in Adults with Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Grade-Assessed Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of Ubiquinol on Cognitive Function, Blood Pressure, Arterial Stiffness, and Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in the Elderly: A Randomized Trial.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Coenzyme Q10 and Cognition: A Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Coenzyme Q10 is a naturally occurring antioxidant that has been suggested to improve cardiovascular health. Studies examining the effects of Q10 on blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) have found inconsistent results. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the effects of Q10 administration on BP and HR in adults. Methods: A comprehensive search of online databases was conducted until February 2025 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Following screening, relevant data were extracted from the eligible studies. Statistical analyses were conducted using weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Data analysis was performed using the "meta" package in R. Results: The pooled analysis of 45 RCTs (48 effect sizes) showed that Q10 administration significantly reduced systolic BP (WMD: -3.44 mmHg; 95 %CI: [-5.13 to -1.55], Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that CoQ10 supplementation may be an effective adjunctive therapy for reducing systolic blood pressure, especially at doses below 200 mg/day and with longer treatment durations. However, its impact on diastolic blood pressure and heart rate appears minimal. Given its favorable safety profile, CoQ10 could be considered as a supportive option in the management of hypertension, particularly for patients seeking non-pharmacological interventions or those with mild elevations in systolic BP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.