Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40495930›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Novel machine learning models for the prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome after liver transplantation.

Weijie Wu, Zheng Zhang, Shuailei Wang, Ru Xin, Dong Yang, Weifeng Yao, Ziqing Hei, Chaojin Chen, Gangjian Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emerging applications of traditional and generative artificial intelligence in liver transplantation.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Weijie Wu *Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zheng Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuailei WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ru XinDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Dong YangGuangzhou AID Cloud Technology Co., LTD, Guangzhou, China.
Weifeng YaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ziqing HeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Chaojin ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Gangjian LuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after liver transplantation (LT) facilitates timely intervention. We aimed to develop a predictor of post-LT ARDS using machine learning (ML) methods. Data from 755 patients in the internal validation set and 115 patients in the external validation set were retrospectively reviewed, covering demographics, etiology, medical history, laboratory results, and perioperative data. According to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and F1-value, the prediction performance of seven ML models, including logistic regression (LR), decision tree, random forest (RF), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), naïve bayes (NB), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) were evaluated and compared with acute lung injury prediction scores (LIPS). 234 (30.99%) ARDS patients were diagnosed. The RF model had the best performance, with an AUROC of 0.766 (accuracy: 0.722, sensitivity: 0.617) in the internal validation set and a comparable AUROC of 0.844 (accuracy: 0.809, sensitivity: 0.750) in the external validation set. The performance of all ML models was better than LIPS (AUROC 0.692, 0.776). The predictor variables included the age of the recipient, BMI, MELD score, total bilirubin, prothrombin time, operation time, standard urine volume, total intake volume, and red blood cell infusion volume. We firstly developed a risk predictor of post-LT ARDS based on RF model to ameliorate clinical practice.

Indexed as

acute respiratory distress syndromeliver transplantationmachine learningprediction modelrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID40495930
PMCPMC12150849

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.