SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Novel therapies for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interventions for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a systematic review of neuroplastic mechanisms, comparative efficacy, and multimodal approaches.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Traditional Chinese medicine interventions for post-stroke cognitive impairment: an evidence mapping.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Psychometric Validation of a User-Centered Usability and Acceptance Instrument for Home-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment.Brain & NeuroRehabilitation · 2026Article
- Analysis of Predictive Factors for Cognitive Function Improvement After tDCS Treatment in Patients With Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Article
- ESO annual stroke evidence update 2025.European stroke journal · 2026Review
- Recognizing, managing, and preventing cognitive sequelae after stroke. A narrative review.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2026Review
- Robotic rehabilitation with the LokomatFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- It's More than Just a Game: Exploring the Benefits of Mixed Reality on Cognition in a Stroke Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Integrative neurobiological mechanisms of acupuncture in post-stroke cognitive impairment: from neurotransmission to brain network remodeling.Frontiers in neurologyReview
- Comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke impacts 15 million people annually, ranking as the second-leading cause of mortality and the third-leading cause of disability globally. Despite advances in acute care, long-term cognitive impairments persist in 30-70% of survivors, impeding rehabilitation and increasing dependency. The existing treatments for post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) show limited efficacy, underscoring the need for more comprehensive approaches. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of novel therapeutic interventions for PSCI. Methods: The present systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024621445). A comprehensive search in PubMed and EMBASE identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the past 5 years examining PSCI interventions, with the selection criterion being an assessment of the trials using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Statistical analyses included pooled mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), heterogeneity assessment, and subgroup analyses. Results: Of 755 identified articles, 22 RCTs involving 5,100 participants met the inclusion criteria. The results demonstrated that brain stimulation therapies, particularly transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS; MD 4.56, 95% CI: 3.19-5.93) and pharmacological interventions (MD 4.00, 95% CI: 3.48-4.52) exhibited significant benefits. Acupuncture showed potential benefits (MD 2.65, 95% CI: 1.07-4.23), albeit with considerable variability. Training approaches yielded mixed outcomes (MD 1.53, 95% CI: -0.09-3.15). Early interventions (within 3 months post-stroke) were the most effective. Discussion: Brain stimulation, especially tDCS, resulted in consistent cognitive benefits, with early initiation enhancing outcomes. Pharmacotherapy demonstrated robust, generalizable results, while cognitive training showed small but reliable effects. Acupuncture and physical training hold potential but require further standardization. Conclusion: Effective stroke rehabilitation requires a multimodal, personalized approach integrating brain stimulation, pharmacotherapy, and cognitive training. Early intervention is critical for maximizing neuroplasticity, the effect of later interventions needs further evaluation. Standardization is needed to optimize physical training and alternative medicine. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024621445.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.