ArticlePublic health challenges2023
Article in Public health challenges, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the instrumental role of vaccines, public confidence is declining, and anti-vaccine movements have increased worldwide. With the goal of informing policy decisions and the development of interventions, we explore the concerns and challenges related to vaccine uptake (of childhood, maternal, and COVID-19 vaccines) among parents or caregivers of under-two children and pregnant women in urban and rural communities in the Philippines. Methods: Between May and June 2022, we conducted combined in-person and online interviews with purposively selected caregivers and pregnant women in the Calabarzon region (Naic, Cavite and Tanay, Rizal), and National Capital Region (Pasay and Muntinlupa Cities), Philippines. A total of 43 interviews were completed, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed according to the tenets of hermeneutic phenomenology. Results: Our results, grounded on the social ecological model, underlined the interplays of contextual or logistical challenges on vaccine uptake, respondents' overarching concerns about vaccines, and their informational needs that affected their vaccine decision-making. Respondents described that the long-established maternal and childhood vaccines no longer represent a high-risk concern but highlighted their fears and hesitancy particularly to newer vaccines. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the multilayered challenges in vaccine decision-making among caregivers and pregnant women. The volatility of vaccine decision-making necessitates rethinking the current immunization process, recalibrating the health workforce, and reinvigorating the health information delivery channels for more inclusive and responsive health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.