ArticleEcancermedicalscience2025
Understanding of cervical cancer, human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV vaccine among women from Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of HPV vaccine hesitancy in South Asia: a systematic review.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2026Review
- Low public awareness of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and associated challenges in Pakistan: an editorial.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Awareness, factual knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccination among adult women in Palestine: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer, primarily caused by persistent infection with high-risk strains of Human Papillomavirus (HPV), is a major health concern worldwide, particularly in developing countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan. A total of 212 women participated in the study, with 68.4% from Pakistan and 31.6% from Afghanistan. The majority of participants (80.7%) were from urban areas, and the most common age group was 31 to 50 years (46.2%), 60.8% being illiterate, 77.3% were non-working and 92% were married. The study found that both Pakistani and Afghan participants had similar, non-significant knowledge regarding cervical cancer and HPV, with Pakistani participants showing slightly higher awareness. Education played a crucial role in knowledge levels; Pakistani women, particularly those with higher education, were more informed about the prevention and early treatment of cervical cancer. However, knowledge about HPV vaccines was low across both groups, with Pakistani women being more aware than Afghan women. In terms of willingness to vaccinate children and pay for vaccines, Pakistani participants showed greater enthusiasm compared to Afghan participants, although the differences were non-significant. Logistic regression analysis showed that education, urban background and employment status were significantly linked to knowledge about cervical cancer, HPV and its vaccine. Women with higher education and urban backgrounds had better knowledge and were more willing to pay for the vaccine. In conclusion, this study highlights the influence of socio-demographic factors, such as education, urban background and employment status, on women's knowledge about cervical cancer, HPV and its vaccine. Although both Pakistani and Afghan participants demonstrated similar levels of awareness, Pakistani women, especially those with higher education, were more knowledgeable about prevention and early treatment options. Despite limited awareness about HPV vaccines, Pakistani participants exhibited more willingness to vaccinate their children and pay for the vaccine compared to Afghan participants. These findings underscore the importance of education and urbanisation in improving health knowledge and vaccine uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.