Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496630›Full record

ArticleBioactive materials2025

Quantum machine learning-based electrokinetic mining for the identification of nanoparticles and exosomes with minimal training data.

Abhimanyu Thakur, Pedro Correia Santos Bezerra, Abhishek, Shihao Zeng, Kui Zhang, Werner Treptow, Alexander Luna, Urszula Dougherty, Akushika Kwesi, Isabella R Huang and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles: Bridging communication and next-generation theranostics.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Harnessing artificial intelligence for engineering extracellular vesicles.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Abhimanyu ThakurPritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Pedro Correia Santos BezerraThe University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago, IL, USA.
AbhishekDepartment of Analytics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Shihao ZengDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, 5 Sassoon Road, Hong Kong, China.
Kui ZhangPritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Werner TreptowTheoretical and Computational Biology Lab (LBTC) from Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brazil.
Alexander LunaSection of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Urszula DoughertySection of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Akushika KwesiSection of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Isabella R HuangThe Laboratory Schools, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christine BestvinaDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Marina Chiara GarassinoDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Fuyu DuanPritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Yash GokhalePritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Bin DuanMary & Dick Holland Regenerative Medicine Program and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Yin ChenDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Qizhou LianFaculty of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology, Key Laboratory of Quantitative Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Marc BissonnetteSection of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jianpan HuangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, 5 Sassoon Road, Hong Kong, China.
Huanhuan Joyce ChenPritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Pilot Program CoreP30ES027792 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Gokhan M. Mutlu, Gail S Prins · 2017 to 2026
$13.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES027792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic and naturally occurring particles, such as nanoparticles (NPs) and exosomes; a type of extracellular vesicles (EVs), have garnered widespread attention across various fields, including biomaterials, oncology, and delivery systems for drugs and vaccines. Traditional methods for identifying NPs and EVs, such as transmission electron microscopy, are often prohibitively expensive and labor-intensive. As an alternative, the assessment of electrokinetic attributes such as zeta potential or electrophoretic mobility, conductance, and mean count rate, offers a more cost-effective, rapid, and reliable means of characterizing these particles. In this context, we introduce the first application of a quantum machine learning (QML)-based electrokinetic mining for the identification of green-synthesized iron- and cobalt-based NPs, as well as exosomes derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESC), human lung cancer (A549) cells, and colorectal cancer (CRC) cells, based solely on their electrokinetic attributes. Comparative analyses involving cross-validation, train-test splits, confusion matrices, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves revealed that classical ML techniques could accurately identify the types of NPs and EVs. Notably, QML demonstrated proficiency in differentiating between various NPs and EVs, including the distinction of EVs in the plasma of CRC patients versus those of healthy individuals. Furthermore, QML's application has been extended to the identification of NPs along with EVs in the plasma of CRC patients and experimental mice, achieving higher prediction performance even with a minimal training dataset, demonstrating that QML based electrokinetic mining could identify NPs or EVs with minimal training data, thereby facilitating novel clinical development in the realm of liquid biopsies.

Indexed as

Electrokinetic analysisExtracellular vesicleLiquid biopsyMachine learningNanoparticleQuantum machine learning

Identifiers

PMID40496630
PMCPMC12149654

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.