ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025
A clustering approach to integrative analyses of multiomic cancer data.
Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid technological advances have allowed for molecular profiling across multiple omics domains for clinical decision-making in many diseases, especially cancer. However, as tumor development and progression are biological processes involving composite genomic aberrations, key challenges are to effectively assimilate information from these domains to identify genomic signatures and druggable biological entities, develop accurate risk prediction profiles for future patients, and identify novel patient subgroups for tailored therapy and monitoring. We propose integrative frameworks for high-dimensional multiple-domain cancer data. These Bayesian mixture model-based approaches coherently incorporate dependence within and between domains to accurately detect tumor subtypes, thus providing a catalog of genomic aberrations associated with cancer taxonomy. The flexible and scalable Bayesian nonparametric strategy performs simultaneous bidirectional clustering of the tumor samples and genomic probes to achieve dimension reduction. We describe an efficient variable selection procedure that can identify relevant genomic aberrations and potentially reveal underlying drivers of disease. Although the work is motivated by lung cancer datasets, the proposed methods are broadly applicable in a variety of contexts involving high-dimensional data. The success of the methodology is demonstrated using artificial data and lung cancer omics profiles publicly available from The Cancer Genome Atlas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.