Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40497161›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025

A clustering approach to integrative analyses of multiomic cancer data.

Dongyan Yan, Subharup Guha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dongyan YanUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Subharup GuhaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

The Boston Lung Cancer Survival CohortU01CA209414 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI David C Christiani · 2017 to 2026
$12.2M
Detecting racial disparities in cancer survival by integrating multiple high-dimensional observational studiesR01CA269398 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GUHA, SUBHARUP, LI, YI · 2022 to 2025
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA269398NCI NIH HHS U01 CA209414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid technological advances have allowed for molecular profiling across multiple omics domains for clinical decision-making in many diseases, especially cancer. However, as tumor development and progression are biological processes involving composite genomic aberrations, key challenges are to effectively assimilate information from these domains to identify genomic signatures and druggable biological entities, develop accurate risk prediction profiles for future patients, and identify novel patient subgroups for tailored therapy and monitoring. We propose integrative frameworks for high-dimensional multiple-domain cancer data. These Bayesian mixture model-based approaches coherently incorporate dependence within and between domains to accurately detect tumor subtypes, thus providing a catalog of genomic aberrations associated with cancer taxonomy. The flexible and scalable Bayesian nonparametric strategy performs simultaneous bidirectional clustering of the tumor samples and genomic probes to achieve dimension reduction. We describe an efficient variable selection procedure that can identify relevant genomic aberrations and potentially reveal underlying drivers of disease. Although the work is motivated by lung cancer datasets, the proposed methods are broadly applicable in a variety of contexts involving high-dimensional data. The success of the methodology is demonstrated using artificial data and lung cancer omics profiles publicly available from The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Indexed as

Bayesian nonparametricBidirectional clusteringDirichlet processGibbs samplingTCGA

Identifiers

PMID40497161
PMCPMC12147493

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.