ArticleCell reports methods2025
CRISPR GENome and epigenome engineering improves loss-of-function genetic-screening approaches.
Article in Cell reports methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Content CRISPR Screening: Methods and Applications.MedComm · 2026Review
- Patient-Derived Organoid-Based CRISPR Screens in Cancer Research: Applications, Advances, and Challenges.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- An overview of CRISPR-artificial intelligence theranostics: Current and emerging applications.Biomaterials translational · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas9 technology has revolutionized genotype-to-phenotype assignments through large-scale loss-of-function (LOF) screens. However, limitations like editing inefficiencies and unperturbed genes cause significant noise in data collection. To address this, we introduce CRISPR gene and epigenome engineering (CRISPRgenee), which uses two specific single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) to simultaneously repress and cleave the target gene within the same cell, increasing LOF efficiencies and reproducibility. CRISPRgenee outperforms conventional CRISPR knockout (CRISPRko), CRISPR interference (CRISPRi), and CRISPRoff systems in suppressing challenging targets and regulators of cell proliferation. Additionally, it efficiently suppresses modulators of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and impairs neuronal differentiation in a human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) model. CRISPRgenee exhibits improved depletion efficiency, reduced sgRNA performance variance, and accelerated gene depletion compared to individual CRISPRi or CRISPRko screens, ensuring consistency in phenotypic effects and identifying more significant gene hits. By combining CRISPRko and CRISPRi, CRISPRgenee increases LOF rates without increasing genotoxic stress, facilitating library size reduction for advanced LOF screens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.