Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40499551›Full record

ArticleCell reports methods2025

CRISPR GENome and epigenome engineering improves loss-of-function genetic-screening approaches.

Jannis Stadager, Chiara Bernardini, Laura Hartmann, Henrik May, Jessica Wiepcke, Monika Kuban, Zeynab Najafova, Steven A Johnsen, Stefan Legewie, Franziska R Traube and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jannis StadagerUniversity Stuttgart, Department of Molecular Biochemistry, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Chiara BernardiniUniversity Stuttgart, Department of Cellular Biochemistry, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Laura HartmannUniversity Stuttgart, Institute of Biomedical Genetics, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Henrik MayUniversity Stuttgart, Department of Molecular Biochemistry, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Jessica WiepckeUniversity Stuttgart, Department of Molecular Biochemistry, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Monika KubanUniversity Stuttgart, Institute of Biomedical Genetics, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Zeynab NajafovaRobert Bosch Center for Tumor Diseases, Auerbachstraße 112, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany.
Steven A JohnsenRobert Bosch Center for Tumor Diseases, Auerbachstraße 112, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany.
Stefan LegewieUniversity Stuttgart, Institute of Biomedical Genetics, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Franziska R TraubeUniversity Stuttgart, Department of Cellular Biochemistry, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Julian JudeTWIST Bioscience, 681 Gateway Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
Philipp RathertUniversity Stuttgart, Department of Molecular Biochemistry, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany. Electronic address: philipp.rathert@ibc.uni-stuttgart.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 technology has revolutionized genotype-to-phenotype assignments through large-scale loss-of-function (LOF) screens. However, limitations like editing inefficiencies and unperturbed genes cause significant noise in data collection. To address this, we introduce CRISPR gene and epigenome engineering (CRISPRgenee), which uses two specific single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) to simultaneously repress and cleave the target gene within the same cell, increasing LOF efficiencies and reproducibility. CRISPRgenee outperforms conventional CRISPR knockout (CRISPRko), CRISPR interference (CRISPRi), and CRISPRoff systems in suppressing challenging targets and regulators of cell proliferation. Additionally, it efficiently suppresses modulators of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and impairs neuronal differentiation in a human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) model. CRISPRgenee exhibits improved depletion efficiency, reduced sgRNA performance variance, and accelerated gene depletion compared to individual CRISPRi or CRISPRko screens, ensuring consistency in phenotypic effects and identifying more significant gene hits. By combining CRISPRko and CRISPRi, CRISPRgenee increases LOF rates without increasing genotoxic stress, facilitating library size reduction for advanced LOF screens.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsEpigenomeGene EditingGenetic TestingLoss of Function MutationCell DifferentiationEpigenome EditingEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionGene Knockout TechniquesHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCP: biotechnologyCRISPR-Cas9CRISPR screeningepigenome editinggene editinggene loss-of-function studies

Identifiers

PMID40499551
PMCPMC12272254

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.