ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025
Cell fate ratios are encoded by transcriptional dynamics in the Drosophila retina.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensory receptor expansion and neural accommodation in butterfly color vision.Science advances · 2026Article
- Sensory receptor expansion and neural accommodation in butterfly color vision.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Gastruloid patterning reflects division of labor among biased stem cell clones.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although transcription happens in bursts, it is unclear whether variation in the rate and pattern of bursting matters during animal development. We examined whether the amount and timing of transcription influence the ratio of cell types produced during stochastic patterning of the Drosophila retina. This system is balanced between 2 outcomes: ∼70% of R7 photoreceptors (PRs) express Rhodopsin 4 (Rh4), and the rest express Rhodopsin 3 (Rh3). Cell fate depends on the cell-intrinsic binary decision to express the transcription factor spineless (Ss). Changing the ss bursting pattern by replacing the ss core promoter led to a different ratio of R7 PR types. We hypothesized that random variation in the timing of transcriptional initiation followed by autoregulation might control the outcome. Instead, we found that the decision occurs before R7 specification and before protein is made, with no feedback via Ss protein. Surprisingly, this happens in a field of progenitor cells that give rise to all retina cell types, which all initially transcribe ss. A subset stops transcribing ss over time. Those that become R7s and maintain ss transcription take the Ss-ON/Rh4 fate. Live imaging of ss transcription suggests increased time spent in off periods could decrease the probability of new transcription and therefore the Ss-ON ratio. Transiently increasing continuity of transcription produces all Ss-ON outcomes, while introducing longer gaps lowers the ratio. Targeting CBP to the ss locus increases the ratio, indicating a repressive role for chromatin state during periods when transcription is inactive. We conclude the ratio is set by the amount and dynamics of ss transcription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.