ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Real-world outcomes, including intraocular inflammation, after intravitreal brolucizumab for diabetic macular edema.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intravitreal Brolucizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Outcomes in Treatment-Naive and Anti-VEGF-Switched Eyes over 48 Weeks.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Therapeutic peptides and proteins: Status and developments in drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026Review
- Aflibercept and Brolucizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema: A Focused Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Clinical Considerations.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to assess the real-world outcomes, including intraocular inflammation (IOI), following administration of intravitreal brolucizumab (Beovu 6.0 mg/0.05 mL; Novartis) injections (IVBr) for diabetic macular edema (DME). STUDY
designRetrospective study.
methodsA total of 56 eyes of 47 patients with DME were treated with IVBr for a minimum follow-up of at least 6 months between May 2022 and November 2023. A "non-strict pro re nata" dosing protocol for IVBr was used. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and the latest visit date and IVBr frequency were assessed to evaluate the treatment efficacy. IOI incidence, baseline characteristics of patients with IOI, and treatment course were investigated.
resultsBCVA significantly improved at 6 months and at the latest visit compared to baseline (P = 0.008 and 0.006, respectively). CMT was significantly thinner at 6 months, 1 year, and the latest visit compared to baseline (all, P < 0.001). In 46 eyes followed for more than 1 year, the number of IVBr from baseline to 1 year was 3.8 ± 1.9. Four eyes (7.1%) of four patients (8.5%) developed IOI during the observation period. All patients were women, with an average age of 70.8 ± 9.0 years (59-81 years). Upon IOI diagnosis, all patients received posterior sub-Tenon's triamcinolone acetonide and topical betamethasone sodium phosphate, resulting in rapid resolution.
conclusionIOI developed in four of 56 (7.1%) eyes and responded well to prompt steroid therapy after 1.5 years of IVBr use for DME. BCVA and CMT improved at all evaluation time points. With an average of 3.8 IVBr injections per year, IVBr showed long-term efficacy for DME in the real-world setting, although the occurrence of IOI should be monitored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.