ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2025
Determining the Importance of Clinical Modalities for NeuroDegenerative Disorders and Risk of Patient Injury Using Machine Learning and Survival Analysis.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- IRIS: Interpretable Risk Clustering Intelligence for Survival Analysis.Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data · 2025Article
- Integrating Social Determinants of Health in a Multi-Modal Deep Clustering Survival Model for Injury-Risk in Alzheimer's and Related Dementia Patients.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Falls among the elderly and especially those with NeuroDegenerative Disorders (NDD) reduces life expectancy. The purpose of this study is to explore the role of Machine Learning on Electronic Health Records (EHR) data for time-to-event survival analysis prediction of injuries, and role of sensitive attributes, e.g., Race, Ethnicity, Sex, in these models. We used multiple survival analysis methods on a cohort of 29,045 patients 65 years and older treated at PennMedicine for either NDD, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), or another disease. We compare the algorithms and explore the role of multiple modalities on improving prediction of injuries among NDD patients, specifically medications and laboratory tests. Overall, we found that medication features resulted in either increased Hazard Ratios (HR) or reduced HR depending on the NDD type. We found that being of Black race significantly increased the risk offall/injury in the models that included only medication and sensitive attribute features. The combined model that used both modalities (medications and laboratory information) removed this relationship between being of Black race and increases in fall/injury. Therefore, we found that combining modalities in these survival models in the prediction offall/injury risk among NDD and MCI individuals results in findings that are robust to different Racial and Ethnic groups with no biases apparent in our final combined modality results. Furthermore, combining modalities (both medications and laboratory values) improved the survival analysis performance across multiple survival analysis methods, when compared using the C-index.
Identifiers
40502273PMC12150751What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.