ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
GLP-1 receptor agonist use in elective lumbar spine surgery: Reduced pseudarthrosis rates and favorable safety profile.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists affect outcomes after spine surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- Differential impact of pre-operative tirzepatide compared to glucagon-like-peptide-1 single receptor agonists on outcomes of spinal fusion surgery in obese patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use and clinical outcomes after posterior cervical spinal fusion for degenerative pathologies: A large cohort retrospective analysis.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
- Association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use with patient-reported outcomes after lumbar decompression or fusion.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
- Do GLP-1 agonists affect perioperative risk in spine surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Review
- Contemporary perspectives on metabolic surgery for type 2 diabetes: surgical techniques, outcomes, and complications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obesity and diabetes mellitus are well documented to to elevate perioperative risks in spine surgery; hence, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have gained popularity due to their efficacy in improving glycemic control and weight loss. However, their impact on lumbar spine-specific outcomes remains underexplored. This study evaluates associations between preoperative GLP-1 RA use and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of 5722 patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery was conducted using data from the TriNetX database. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: (1) GLP-1 RA users, defined by a documented prescription within six months prior to surgery, and (2) non-users. The cohorts were matched in a 1:1 ratio via propensity score matching based on age, BMI, diabetes status, and relevant comorbidities. Outcomes assessed included major medical complications within 90 days and mechanical complications (pseudarthrosis, foot drop, post-laminectomy syndrome, and reoperation rates) at 1- and 3-year follow-up intervals. Results: No significant differences were observed between the GLP-1 RA and control cohorts regarding rates of medical complications within the 90-day postoperative period. However, concerning mechanical complications, GLP-1 RA users demonstrated significantly lower rates of pseudarthrosis at 1 year (6.54% vs. 8.53%; RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.95; p < 0.05), an effect that persisted through the 3-year follow-up (8.88% vs. 10.77%; RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73-0.99; p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed in reoperation rates or other mechanical complications at either the 1-year or 3-year follow-up intervals. Conclusion: Preoperative GLP-1 RA use was not associated with increased short- or intermediate-term medical or mechanical complications following lumbar spine procedures. Notably, GLP-1 RA use correlated with reduced rates of pseudarthrosis at 1- and 3-year intervals. These findings support the safety and potential benefits of GLP-1 RAs in metabolically high-risk patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.