ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2025
Effects of modifying the pulse width on cognitive side effects with electroconvulsive therapy for schizophrenia.
Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The majority of studies have shown substantially reduced cognitive impairment with ultra-brief pulse (UBP) electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) compared to brief pulse (BP) ECT, though the results remain inconclusive. Methods: This study employed a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial design. A total of 114 patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) were enrolled and received BP ECT (63 participants) or UBP ECT (51 participants). Cognitive function was assessed before and after treatment, with peripheral blood biomarkers and hippocampal magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data collected concurrently. Results: No significant baseline differences in demographic or clinical characteristics were observed between the two groups. After the end of ECT sessions, the UBP group and BP group respectively showed advantages in the Trail Making Test (TMT) and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT). No between-group differences reached statistical significance in other cognitive tests. The homocysteine, prolactin, inducible nitric oxide synthase and left hippocampal myoinositol (MI) levels were significantly elevated in the UBP group than those in the BP group. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that right hippocampal MI levels were positively correlated with TMT scores. Conclusion: There are no significant differences in efficacy between UBP ECT at high-dosage and BP ECT, and further research is required to determine whether this modality can reduce cognitive impairment after treatment. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=243964, registration number: ChiCTR2400091601.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.