ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025
Semi-parametric validation of genomic predictions and polygenic risk scores with the Blupf90 software suite.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Multi-Breed Genomic Prediction Models for Carcass and Reproductive Traits in Zebu Beef Cattle.Animal genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Validation of genomic predictions or polygenic risk scores is key for model selection and evaluating the performance of the chosen prediction machinery. Non-parametric validation, such as cross-validation, is popular but does not account for population structure and the fact that the interest could be in validating a set of individuals and not the entire population. Semi-parametric methods, such as the LR method, also use removed records to validate predictions, account for population structure, and allow focus on a specific set of individuals of interest. Confidence intervals are obtained using semi-parametric methods without the need for repeated cross-validation. We developed a tool within the Blupf90 software suite, called validationf90, that allows researchers to conduct semi-parametric validation from the solutions obtained from that software suite. validationf90 calculates different validation statistics and their confidence intervals for a pre-defined set of individuals of interest, reflecting the bias and accuracy of genomic predictions. The program allows for genomic predictions obtained from frequentist and Bayesian methods, as well as for categorical data. validationf90 can validate any model supported by the Blupf90 software suite and can be used with animal, plant, and human datasets. Predictions obtained with other software can be provided to validationf90 as long as the input format matches with the Blupf90 format.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.