Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504236›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025

Identification of a novel QTL associated with Fusarium head blight resistance on chromosome 3B in common wheat.

Wenjing Hu, Xiao Zhang, Dongmei Zhu, Die Zhao, Rui Yong, Junchao You, Yong Zhang, Derong Gao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-wide association mapping of native QTLs for Fusarium head blight resistance in US winter wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  3. Identification of a stable genetic locus and candidate genes for Fusarium head blight resistance on wheat chromosome 3BL.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wenjing HuLixiahe Institute of Agriculture Sciences, Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement for Low & Middle Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangzhou, 225007, Jiangsu, China. huren2008@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4375-1341
Xiao ZhangLixiahe Institute of Agriculture Sciences, Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement for Low & Middle Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangzhou, 225007, Jiangsu, China.
Dongmei ZhuLixiahe Institute of Agriculture Sciences, Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement for Low & Middle Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangzhou, 225007, Jiangsu, China.
Die ZhaoLixiahe Institute of Agriculture Sciences, Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement for Low & Middle Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangzhou, 225007, Jiangsu, China.
Rui YongLixiahe Institute of Agriculture Sciences, Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement for Low & Middle Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangzhou, 225007, Jiangsu, China.
Junchao YouLixiahe Institute of Agriculture Sciences, Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement for Low & Middle Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangzhou, 225007, Jiangsu, China.
Yong ZhangLixiahe Institute of Agriculture Sciences, Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement for Low & Middle Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangzhou, 225007, Jiangsu, China.
Derong GaoLixiahe Institute of Agriculture Sciences, Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement for Low & Middle Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangzhou, 225007, Jiangsu, China. gdr@wheat.org.com.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China 32261143462The National Natural Science Foundation of China 32341037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageA novel Fusarium head blight resistance locus, QFhb-3BL, was identified and fine-mapped in common wheat. Identification and utilization of major resistance genes is key to developing new wheat cultivars/lines with improved Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistance. In this study, a moderately FHB-resistant cultivar Yangmai 16.2 (YM16.2) was crossed with a susceptible cultivar Yanzhan 1 (YZ1) to create a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population. Using bulk segregant analysis sequencing (BSA-seq) and linkage analysis, a new FHB quantitative trait locus (QTL) named QFhb-3BL, contributed by YM16.2, was identified. Eight Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR (KASP) markers were used to detect homozygous recombinants in the derived lines of the remaining heterozygous line (RHL). QFhb-3BL was finely mapped to the 751.10-756.45 Mb interval, which contains 75 high-confidence genes. Through variation analysis of the candidate region and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), we identified 11 genes with sequence variations and 14 genes expressed within the fine-mapping interval, with four genes overlapping between the two groups. KASP markers for the candidate gene TraesCS3B03G1226500 were validated in 103 wheat cultivars/lines, and lines carrying these markers showed a 38.89% reduction in FHB severity. This study provides a foundation for QFhb-3BL cloning and an effective marker for FHB resistance breeding.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantDisease ResistanceFusariumPlant DiseasesQuantitative Trait LociTriticumChromosome MappingGenes, PlantGenetic LinkageGenetic MarkersPhenotypeGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.