Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504255›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2025

An open problem: Why are motif-avoidant attractors so rare in asynchronous Boolean networks?

Samuel Pastva, Kyu Hyong Park, Ondřej Huvar, Jordan C Rozum, Réka Albert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel PastvaFaculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Botanicka 68a, 60200, Brno, Czech Republic. xpastva@fi.muni.cz.
Kyu Hyong ParkDepartment of Physics, Davey Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, 16802, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ondřej HuvarFaculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Botanicka 68a, 60200, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jordan C RozumDepartment of Systems Science and Industrial Engineering, Binghamton University (State University of New York), Engineering Building, 13850, Vestal, New York, USA. jrozum@binghamton.edu.
Réka AlbertDepartment of Physics, Davey Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, 16802, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA. rza1@psu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-0828

Funding

Army Research Office 79961-SM-MURGrantová Agentura Ceské Republiky No. GA22-10845SHORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 101034413National Science Foundation MCB 1715826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asynchronous Boolean networks are a type of discrete dynamical system in which each variable can take one of two states, and a single variable state is updated in each time step according to pre-selected rules. Boolean networks are popular in systems biology due to their ability to model long-term biological phenotypes within a qualitative, predictive framework. Boolean networks model phenotypes as attractors, which are closely linked to minimal trap spaces (inescapable hypercubes in the system's state space). In biological applications, attractors and minimal trap spaces are typically in one-to-one correspondence. However, this correspondence is not guaranteed: motif-avoidant attractors (MAAs) that lie outside minimal trap spaces are possible. MAAs are rare and poorly understood, despite recent efforts. In this contribution to the BMB & JMB Special Collection "Problems, Progress and Perspectives in Mathematical and Computational Biology", we summarize the current state of knowledge regarding MAAs and present several novel observations regarding their response to node deletion reductions and linear extensions of edges. We conduct large-scale computational studies on an ensemble of 14 000 models derived from published Boolean models of biological systems, and more than 100 million Random Boolean Networks. Our findings quantify the rarity of MAAs; in particular, we only observed MAAs in biological models after applying standard simplification methods, highlighting the role of network reduction in introducing MAAs into the dynamics. We also show that MAAs are fragile to linear extensions: in sparse networks, even a single linear node can disrupt virtually all MAAs. Motivated by this observation, we improve the upper bound on the number of delays needed to disrupt a motif-avoidant attractor.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMathematical ConceptsPhenotypeSystems BiologyBiomolecular networksBoolean modelsBoolean networksComplex systemsDiscrete dynamicsStable motifTrap spaces

Identifiers

PMID40504255
PMCPMC12162798

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.