ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Novel Computational Model for Recapitulating Patent Ductus Arteriosus Stenting Interventions.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) stenting is a minimally invasive procedure used to maintain pulmonary blood flow in patients with ductal-dependent cyanotic congenital heart disease. However, because of its high complexity, anatomic variability, and frequent need for reinterventions, improved pre-procedural planning is necessary. In this retrospective study, we developed a physics-based computational framework to simulate PDA stenting using patient-specific data. We applied this method to two patients from a single center: Patient 1 had a type I PDA with a single stent implantation, while Patient 2 had a type II PDA and underwent placement of two stents. We segmented pre-procedural CT scans, modeled guidewire tracking and the bent pre-deployment configurations of the angioplasty balloon and stent, and simulated stent deployment within patient-specific PDA anatomies. Quantitative validation against post-procedural segmentations showed an average distance error of less than 1 mm, demonstrating high accuracy in replicating real-world outcomes. The pipeline effectively captured key mechanical interactions among the stent, balloon, guidewire, and PDA, highlighting phenomena, such as PDA straightening, changes in diameter and orientation, and the displacement of surrounding vasculature during deployment. Future work will integrate semiautomatic tools to predict the best-suited procedural parameters, including stent length, diameter, positioning, and vascular access and predicted risk of complications. Ultimately, our goal is to develop a predictive platform that enhances clinical decision-making, optimizes procedural efficiency, and reduces complications and reinterventions, thereby improving outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing PDA stenting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.