Trial reportJournal of neurology2025
Changes in corticosteroid and non-steroidal immunosuppressive therapy with long-term zilucoplan treatment in generalized myasthenia gravis.
Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of RA101495 in Subjects With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Confirm the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Zilucoplan in Subjects With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-Label Extension Study of Zilucoplan in Subjects With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment Characteristics and Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Initiating Rozanolixizumab: A US Claims Database Analysis.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of zilucoplan in patients with anti-AChR myasthenia gravis: A retrospective cohort study in France.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Italian recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Advancing Care in Myasthenia Gravis: What Can We Learn From the Multiple Sclerosis Community?Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Safety profile of complement C5 inhibitors and FcRn inhibitors in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: analysis of the FAERS database and disease-gene interaction network.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Disease burden of myasthenia gravis in relation to oral corticosteroid dose: an insurance claims database study in Japan.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy and safety of complement component 5 inhibitor zilucoplan in patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) were assessed in two double-blind studies (NCT03315130/NCT04115293 [RAISE]). During these studies and the first 12 weeks of the open-label extension study, RAISE-XT, corticosteroid and non-steroidal immunosuppressive therapy (NSIST) doses were kept stable; thereafter doses could be changed at the investigator's discretion. We evaluated corticosteroid and NSIST dose changes in patients with gMG during zilucoplan treatment in RAISE-XT.
methodsIn RAISE-XT, patients who completed a qualifying double-blind study self-administered once-daily subcutaneous zilucoplan 0.3mg/kg. We assessed (post hoc) patients who changed their corticosteroid or NSIST dose relative to double-blind baseline at Week 120 (data cutoff: November 11, 2023).
resultsOverall, 200 patients enrolled. At Week 120, 61.1% (n = 33/54) of patients who were on corticosteroids at double-blind baseline had reduced or discontinued corticosteroids (mean 15.5mg dose reduction); mean change from baseline (CFB) in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score:-6.55 (standard deviation [SD] 3.65). Of patients on NSIST at double-blind baseline, 29.8% (n = 14/47) reduced or discontinued ≥ 1 NSIST; mean CFB in MG-ADL score:-7.57 (SD 4.69). Among all patients at Week 120, 9.3% (n = 8/86) had increased or started corticosteroids; 2.4% of patients (n = 2/85) had increased NSIST, including one who started a new NSIST. Zilucoplan was well tolerated.
conclusionsTreatment with zilucoplan allowed for reduction or discontinuation of corticosteroids in the majority of patients and NSIST in about a third of patients, while maintaining efficacy.
trial registrationNCT04225871; October 2, 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.