ReviewBasic research in cardiology2025
Anti-inflammatory interventions in coronary artery disease: antipodal responses requiring targeted therapeutic strategies.
Review in Basic research in cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cardiovascular Benefit and Gastrointestinal Risk of Colchicine in Secondary Prevention: Risk Associated with Dose and Treatment Duration.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026Pooled it
- [A nomogram model for predicting MACE risk following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI patients: an exploratory study based on serum GSDMD].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammation has a key role in coronary atherosclerotic disease (CAD), as it contributes to the development, progression, instability and rupture of the atherosclerotic plaque. The long-term treatment and continuous suppression of inflammation is a therapeutic goal for patients with increased cardiovascular risk and chronic CAD syndromes. In contrast, in acute myocardial infarction (MI), the presence of inflammation is necessary for smooth healing, tissue neovascularization, and limitation of left ventricular remodeling, rendering a "controlled amount" of inflammation desirable in this context. As a result, the use of nonselective, broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory drugs does not offer any beneficial effect and may turn out to be harmful. Nevertheless, the possibility that modification of a usual inflammatory response in MI with selective anti-inflammatory agents cannot be excluded. Conversely, an excessive, uncontrolled, and prolonged inflammatory response after an acute MI may result in extensive irreversible myocardial damage and should be timely recognized and treated, preferably with a selective anti-inflammatory agent. In the present review we highlight the key role of inflammation in chronic and acute CAD, discuss the underlying pathophysiology, and present the results of representative experimental and clinical studies evaluating the pharmaceutical modification of the inflammatory response in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40504384What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.