Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504407›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025

The newly enacted Italian surrogacy law: Effects on reproductive tourism.

Susanna Marinelli, Giuseppe Gullo, Francesco Circosta, Simona Zaami, Robert Krysiak, Gianluca Montanari Vergallo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susanna Marinelli *School of Law, Polytecnic University of Marche, 60121, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5135-8196
Giuseppe Gullo *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Villa Sofia Cervello Hospital, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4269-4269
Francesco CircostaDepartment of Clinical, Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0000-5201
Simona ZaamiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy. simona.zaami@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5741-7139
Robert KrysiakDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-752, Katowice, Poland.
Gianluca Montanari VergalloDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn Italy, Law No. 169 of November 4, 2024, has come into force, criminalizing surrogacy even if it occurs abroad, provided at least one member of the requesting couple is an Italian citizen. This legislation stems from a firm conviction that surrogacy undermines the dignity of the surrogate mother and places the child thus born in a more precarious situation, compared to a child born to a mother who intends to raise them as her own. The authors have set out to outline a brief overview of surrogacy legal frameworks in Europe and in the USA, as a meaningful sample of Western countries largely sharing a common set of values. The ultimate purpose is to assess the potential effectiveness of this new extremely restrictive Italian law in dissuading Italian couples from seeking surrogacy abroad. MATERIALS AND

methodsFirst-hand sources (national legislative bodies) have been delved into to shed a light on national norms governing surrogacy in major European countries and the USA. Databases De Jure and Onelegale, along with international scientific databases PubMed and Scopus, were drawn upon through the search terms/strings: surrogate motherhood; surrogacy; extraterritorial jurisdiction.

resultsThis law's consistency with European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) jurisprudence and European Union law is dubious: it in fact appears to conflict with freedom of movement within the European Union and the child's best interests. Moreover, while it may hinder the pursuit of parenthood, its effectiveness in preventing reproductive tourism is still unclear.

Indexed as

Gestational CarriersMedical TourismReproductive Techniques, AssistedFemaleHumansItalyMalePregnancyUnited StatesAdoptionAltruistic surrogacyBest interest of the childCommercial surrogacyCross-border reproductive travelEthics of surrogacyProcreative tourismSurrogacy lawUniversal crime

Identifiers

PMID40504407
PMCPMC12423383

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.